Judicial Accolades
What courts across the country have said about Rosen Law's advocacy, results, and professionalism.
Selected quotations from judges recognizing the firm's work on behalf of investors.
[Rosen Law's] success in quickly bringing this litigation to a successful conclusion is perhaps the best indicator of the experience and ability of the attorneys involved. … [Rosen Law] is highly experienced in the complex field of securities fraud class action litigation… The result achieved for Class Members here is solely attributable to the efforts and skill of [Rosen Law]. Unlike in many securities class actions, here [Rosen Law] did not have the advantage of a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation or any other governmental enforcement proceeding. [Rosen Law] assumed the entire risk and expense of prosecuting the case and negotiated this favorable settlement without the assistance of any other governmental or private party.
Judge Freda L. Wolfson
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
Yedlowski v. Roka Bioscience, Inc., et al.
2016
What Judges Have Said
These representative quotes highlight the way courts have described Rosen Law's work in securities class actions and shareholder litigation.
[Rosen Law] took on significant risk in this case, working thoroughly and enthusiastically through extensive litigation that required significant expert involvement.
Judge David O. Carter
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Nguyen v. Radient Pharms. Corp., et al. · 2014
The Rosen Law Firm's depth of involvement as lead counsel throughout the discovery and litigation conducted over the past more than three years further supports [finding that it is well-qualified]
Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
In re NIO, Inc. Sec. Litig. · 2023
I know the Rosen firm. I think they are an excellent law firm. And without examining each aspect of representation, I believe they carried out their job of first quality.
Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
Millunchick v. Sunlight Financial Holdings, et al. · 2024
As the court in In re Fuwei Films Securities Litigation concluded, based on the Firm's experience, 'the Rosen Law Firm is well-qualified to serve as lead counsel in this matter.'
Hon. Cheryl L. Pollak
United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Bensley v. FalconStor Software, Inc., et al. · 2011
Why Judicial Accolades Matter
Courts do more than approve settlements. In order to appoint lead counsel and approve resolutions, judges evaluate the quality of lawyering, results obtained, and risks overcome. Their written opinions often highlight the skill, diligence, and integrity of counsel.
Independent validation
Judicial praise reflects impartial assessment of counsel's work and results.
Track record of success
Positive comments typically follow years of effective advocacy in complex cases.
Confidence for investors
Institutional and individual investors can take comfort in how courts describe the firm's work.
Put Court-Recognized Experience to Work for You
If you believe you have suffered losses from securities fraud or corporate misconduct, learn more about our active class actions or our proven case results.