The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.  The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with material misrepresentations in the Company’s Registration Statement and Prospectus issued for the Company’s public offering of common stock and warrants.  The parties have agreed to settle this action for $850,000 in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial condition and business prospects. The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.2 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of a market manipulation scheme involving National Lampoon’s common stock.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this class action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The complaint alleged that the Company failed to disclose material facts about its primary drug candidate.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $3.5 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violation of §10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act out of the Company’s manipulation of its stock price. The parties settled this case for $1.3 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. The action alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the defendants alleged failure to disclose material adverse information concerning the Company’s products under development and misrepresenting the amount of time it would take to commercialize the products. Plaintiffs settled the case for a $1.2 million cash payment to class members.

The Rosen Law Firm is currently serving as sole Lead Counsel in this class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleges violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements.  Following entry of default against the issuer and certification of the class, the non-issuer defendants and Plaintiffs have preliminarily agreed to resolve the claims against the non-issuer defendants for $778,333.33, subject to court approval.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of Illinois. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out allegations that the Company misstated its true financial condition. The parties settled this action for $3.3 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  Following the dismissal of the action and while on appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, the parties settled this action for $625,000 in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm served as Co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 11 and 15 of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s IPO. Plaintiffs agreed to settle this case for $1.2 million cash payment to class members.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million.

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§11 and 15 of the Securities Act arising out of the company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties settled this action for $2.85 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this consolidated class action in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $2.25 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in the class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. Plaintiffs settled this action for $1.5 million in cash.