The Rosen Law Firm was sole Class Counsel in this multidistrict certified class action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties settled this action for $250 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this consolidated class action in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and §§11b and 15 of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and financial statements. The parties settled the action for $15.3 million in cash.

This class action, in which the Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel, was filed in U.S. District Court for District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act based on allegedly false and misleading SEC filings related to the planned launch of an online brokerage business, and other material misrepresentations, which allegedly inflated the price of Meyerson stock during the class period. Plaintiffs settled the case for a $1.2 million payment to class members.

The Rosen Law Firm was Co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 11, 12(a)(2), and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial condition and adequacy of the Company’s internal controls. Plaintiffs and the issuer defendants preliminarily agreed to a partial settlement of $4.3 million cash payment to class members.  Plaintiffs and the underwriters agreed to a separate $1,893,750 cash payment to class members. The total settlement was $6,193,750 in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. The collective settlement of the class action and consolidated derivative actions are $2.865 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties agreed to settle this case for $9.25 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm served as sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The complaint alleged violations of § 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements in violation of GAAP. Plaintiffs settled this case for $2.75 million cash payment to class members.

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $7 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action on appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial statements. While on appeal following the dismissal of the case, the parties settled the action for $1.215 million in cash.

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading financial information. The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.2 million in cash.