Successes

Christine Asia Co Ltd. v. Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., No. 15-md-2631 (CM) (SDA)

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Class Counsel in this multidistrict certified class action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information.  The parties settled this action for $250 million in cash.

In re USA Technologies, Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 19-cv-4565-JHS

The Rosen Law Firm was sole lead counsel in this consolidated class action in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and §§11b and 15 of the Securities Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and financial statements. The parties settled the action for $15.3 million in cash.

Press v. Delstaff LLC, No. MSC 09-01051

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the California Superior Court for Contra Costa County, brought in connection with a “going private” transaction valued at $1.25/share for the 6.4 million shares implicated in the transaction. The parties settled this action for $1,642,500 in additional compensation to shareholders.

Lee v. Active Power, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-00797

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas.  The complaint alleged violations of §§ 10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of false statements relating to a purported distribution agreement with a major information technology provider.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $1.5 million.

In re IDreamSky Technology Limited Securities Litigation, No. 15-cv-2514 (JPO)

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act §§ 11 and 20(a) of the Securities Act and arising out of the issuance of misleading business information. The parties settled this case for $4.15 million in cash.

Beck v. Walter Investment Management, No. 14-cv-20880-UU

The Rosen Law Firm was co-Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for Southern District of Florida. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company concealing its true financial condition. The parties settled the action for $24 million in cash.

Gianoukas v. Tullio and Riiska, No. 02CC18223

The Rosen Law Firm was lead counsel to a group of twenty-one plaintiffs that brought claims of fraud and negligent misrepresentation in California Superior Court, Orange County against the former Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers of a publicly traded software company, NQL Inc. The complaint alleged that the officers issued a series of false and misleading press releases concerning the business of NQL for the purpose of inducing the purchase and retention of NQL securities. Plaintiffs settled the action favorably for a confidential amount.

Bensley v. FalconStor Software, Inc., No. 10-CV-4672 (ERK) (CLP)

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading statements about the Company’s true financial and business condition.  The parties agreed to settle this action for $5 million in cash.

Romero v. Growlife, Inc., No. 2:14-cv-03015-CAS (JEMx)

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this consolidated class action in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.  The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising the issuance of false statements concerning the Company’s true financial condition.  The parties agreed to settle this action for total consideration of $2.7 million, comprised of $700,000 in cash and $2 million in stock.

Carmack v. Amaya, Inc., No. 16-cv-1884-JHR-JS

The Rosen Law Firm was sole Lead Counsel in this class action in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. The complaint alleged violations of §§10b and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act arising out of the Company’s issuance of materially false and misleading business information. The parties settled this action for $5.75 million in cash.
Scroll to Top